Subscribe for updates
You can subscribe to and manage the information you receive from Stewart Investors by following the link below to our Preference Centre.
You can subscribe to and manage the information you receive from Stewart Investors by following the link below to our Preference Centre.
The investment world also has a few super massive corporations today. The similarities with these large stars are striking. To many observers, much like the massive stars, such companies look wonderfully positioned with strong growth rates. What’s bubbling beneath this glowing surface, however, is usually a precarious balance between rising risks at the core and growth at the surface that likely will be incrementally harder to come by.
Facebook (Meta)*, Apple, Microsoft, Amazon and Google (Alphabet) are among the largest global companies by market capitalization and profits. Let’s call them FAMAG. FAMAG’s market capitalization equals approximately 40% of U.S. GDP and FAMAG generates about 15% of U.S. corporate profits.1 However, FAMAG only pays an average effective tax rate of 13% compared to the 21% corporate tax rate of the U.S.1
Their profits have mostly benefitted a small set of shareholders, founders and management. Inequality in America has now surpassed even the gilded age of the late 1800s. Back then, 2% of the population owned a third of America’s wealth.2 Today just the top 1% controls a similar share of America’s wealth.3FAMAG’s dominance is a result of admirable innovation, technology leadership and long-term vision. Taking a disproportionate share of wallet from customers and suppliers, acquiring competitors and making gargantuan buybacks has, in our view, helped power their growth. FAMAG spent US$473 billion buying back shares in the last five years.1
Large stars and corporations are exceptions not the rule. Only a few grow beyond a certain size and they swallow anything that comes in their way. Between 2010 – 2019, FAMAG acquired 819 small companies that were below threshold reporting requirements4. Such acquisitions fly under the radar of regulatory scrutiny.
Each of these companies have platforms with more than a billion daily users. Microsoft has more than 75 million enterprise customers5. Amazon garnered over 40% of all e-commerce online retail sales in the US in 20206 . Most businesses and individuals have little choice but to become or remain a customer, user or a supplier to these companies. This gives them more user data resulting in a virtuous circle, codified as “the network effect” in management lexicon. Data privacy and security is a huge challenge and regulators have barely scratched the surface in addressing this issue.
FAMAGs have become the engine rooms of society and not just the economy. The above data points in isolation might not pose a risk but viewed collectively should make any government nervous. It seems a question of when, not if, governments will act to check their power. Lina M. Khan, recently appointed chair of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is keen to make the anti-trust framework relevant for the 21st century. It is early days but the intent and direction of travel seems clear.
Microsoft has more than 75 million enterprise customers3 . Amazon garnered over 40% of all e-commerce online retail sales in the US in 20204
China, meanwhile, has begun to act with an iron hand changing rules overnight. Democracies do not have that luxury nor should they. It is likely to be a slow burn of tedious regulation and increased scrutiny**. There is an outside chance these American Supernova companies will be broken up but that will require immense political will and bipartisan support in the U.S. It is difficult to know straight away if such break ups are good or bad for shareholders. Although, we are certain that most of the underlying businesses benefit from being part of these giants either through cross sell opportunities or the ability to endure losses for long periods. We do not have a crystal ball to predict how far regulators can or will go. However, there are enough signs that risks are rising and, we believe, it will be difficult mathematically, socially and politically for FAMAGs to continue growing in the coming decade the way they have in the last.
These predictions are not a figment of our imagination. History provides many clues. A technology revolution sparked America’s gilded age, in the late 1800s. A small number of companies grew rapidly in the span of a few decades monopolizing various parts of the U.S. economy. The anti-trust age started with the passage of the Sherman Antitrust Act in 18907. It culminated with the formation of the FTC in 1914, an independent regulator to protect consumer interests and promote competition. Many of the large corporations of the gilded age do not exist today but their fragments do.
Yet, without these supernovae, human development might have taken a different path. Most of the elements we use to run our daily lives come from the remnants of super massive stars. Large companies might fade away or explode but they leave their footprint in myriad ways for economies to thrive in the future. Many successful companies today were born from the fragments of the gilded age super corporations.
Today’s technology giants have many admirable qualities. However, it is prudent to question their ongoing contribution to sustainable development. Their size, dominance and the concentration of power, information and wealth in the hands of so few does not bode well for broad-based development. These are net cash businesses, with strong cash flow growth and trading at reasonable valuations. A simple financial analysis might suggest FAMAGs could be attractive investments yet such analysis hides many of the risks outlined above.
Super massive stars like UY Scuti usually last no more than a few million years. A smaller star like our Sun will have a lifespan of 10 billion years growing steadily all the way before fading away without an explosion.
Sashi Reddy
January 2022
Download PDF version of this Insight
Investment Terms
View our list of investment terms to help you understand the terminology within this document.
* For illustrative purposes only. Reference to the names of each company mentioned in this communication is merely for explaining the investment strategy and Stewart Investors does not necessarily maintain positions in such companies. Any fund or stock mentioned in this presentation does not constitute any offer or inducement to enter into any investment activity nor is it a recommendation to purchase or sell any security.
** Certain statements, estimates, and projections in this document may be forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based upon First Sentier Investors’ current assumptions and beliefs, in light of currently available information, but involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual actions or results may differ materially from those discussed. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. There is no certainty that current conditions will last, and First Sentier Investors undertakes no obligation to correct, revise or update information herein, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
This material is for general information purposes only. It does not constitute investment or financial advice and does not take into account any specific investment objectives, financial situation or needs. This is not an offer to provide asset management services, is not a recommendation or an offer or solicitation to buy, hold or sell any security or to execute any agreement for portfolio management or investment advisory services and this material has not been prepared in connection with any such offer. Before making any investment decision you should consider, with the assistance of a financial advisor, your individual investment needs, objectives and financial situation.
We have taken reasonable care to ensure that this material is accurate, current, and complete and fit for its intended purpose and audience as at the date of publication. No assurance is given or liability accepted regarding the accuracy, validity or completeness of this material and we do not undertake to update it in future if circumstances change.
To the extent this material contains any expression of opinion or forward-looking statements, such opinions and statements are based on assumptions, matters and sources believed to be true and reliable at the time of publication only.
This material reflects the views of the individual writers only. Those views may change, may not prove to be valid and may not reflect the views of everyone at First Sentier Investors.
About First Sentier Investors
References to ‘we’, ‘us’ or ‘our’ are references to First Sentier Investors, a global asset management business which is ultimately owned by Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (MUFG). Our investment teams operate under the trading name of Stewart Investors which is part of the First Sentier Investors group.
We communicate and conduct business through different legal entities in different locations. This material is communicated in:
To the extent permitted by law, MUFG and its subsidiaries are not liable for any loss or damage as a result of reliance on any statement or information contained in this document. Neither MUFG nor any of its subsidiaries guarantee the performance of any investment products referred to in this document or the repayment of capital. Any investments referred to are not deposits or other liabilities of MUFG or its subsidiaries, and are subject to investment risk, including loss of income and capital invested.
